"Hvis brød er det?"
Translation:Whose bread is it?
17 Comments
- 16
- 11
- 11
- 9
- 3
- 3
I put "whose bread is this", and "that" or "it" would have been correct. Why can't I say "this"? edit I asked this question before I learned about dette/denne ;)
- 9
- 4
- 3
- 2
- 2
Because "this" (dette) as in English has a slight different meaning than "that/it" (det, den). That over there. This over here.
- 12
They got me too, but you're right, there is a slight difference in meaning. Though in practice they're often so degenerate that I fail to consider it X D
- 9
- 4
- 3
- 2
- 2
Yeah :) their use depends on the language, circumstances and where the speaker considers "here" and "there" start and end, but that's the likely grammatical rule the system used when marking his answer wrong.
- 14
- 9
- 6
- 4
- 3
- 3
Also happened to me. Should it not be important that I understand the statement and can translate it without it being a literal translation?
- 21
- 13
- 6
- 6
- 3
- 3
If you don't translate it accurately, how are you proving that you actually understood it?
- 14
- 9
- 6
- 4
- 3
- 3
Because I understand the meaning of the sentence. There is a difference between an accurate and literal translation, if I can demonstrate that I understand what the meaning the sentence is trying to convey than it should be correct.
"Whose bread is it?" and "whose bread is this" are pretty much identical but in my opinion the latter is more specific.
- 21
- 13
- 6
- 6
- 3
- 3
I agree there is a difference between an accurate translation and a literal one. I didn't say you had to be literal. I said you had to be accurate. Having encountered one or two of your other comments where you're complaining about being marked as incorrect, I simply don't think you're accurate.
You've basically acknowledged that there are two slightly different English sentences, one with a more specific word ("this") and one with a less specific word ("it"). Well, it's the same in Danish - there is a post in this thread a little above yours that points out that it's the same in Danish.
And if the Danish you're translating is using the less specific choice, it's simply not an accurate translation if you use the more specific choice in English. If you give the impression of pointing directly at a particular thing in English, that isn't an accurate translation of a Danish sentence that didn't give the impression of pointing.
"Whose bread is this?" means this bread, right here, in your hand or next to you. "Whose bread is it?" doesn't mean that, I could be referring to bread in another room.
She pronounces brød the same when I bite into an unexpected raisin in my bread.
...I hate the pronunciation on this course. "Hvis sprod er de?" While you should pronounce it as "Hvis brøth er duh?" (Roughly)
"Who's" is a contraction of "who is". "Whose" is the possessive pronoun: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/whose
