"Watch out for swimming moose!"

Translation: Se upp för simmande älgar!

[VictorKalb]

Under which circumstances is this a concern?

[JensBjrnha1]

When it is moose swimming season.

[Icarus88]

Could you say "akta sig" instead of ser upp?

[Dsgoo]

Both can be said. You bent some words a bit wrong though, you could say either - Akta dig för simmande älgar! or - Se upp för simmande älgar!

[Icarus88]

What should we do with reflexives when the object isn't stated? Should we use "Akta dig" or "Akta er"?

[Dsgoo]

Good question. "Akta dig" is singular and "Akta er" is plural.
Thanks for the lingot who ever gave me it!

[Segwyne]

I would like to suggest that using älg instead of älgar not be accepted. If we were going to warn someone about a single swimming moose, we would use either "a" or "the" before it. With no article in the English sentence, it really only means the plural.

[mejf]

Plural of "moose"? Mooses?

[Segwyne]

Plural of moose is moose. Having some words in English that are the same both in singular and plural (moose, sheep, fish) helped me wrap my head around ett plurals.

[KiwiDressager]

So... apparently this is a thing after all! I present a swimming moose...

[heraldguy]

också lama