"You should have seen that bird!"

Translation: Je zou die vogel moeten hebben gezien!

[Jonathan--]

I like the "you should have seen that Duo" option.

[AneurinEE]

Could you also say je zou die vogel moeten gezien hebben! instead, or does the word order have to be this?

[Axelels]

you can use both

[anothernobody]

Why was I marked wrong for using "gezien" with "jullie", when it can be used with "jij": "jullie zouden die vogel moeten hebben gezien!" DL marked me wrong for using "jullie...gezien", and put "jij" in place of "jullie". ?!?

[Axelels]

in my opinion jullie should also be accepted

[glossboss]

Dutchgrammar.com gives "had moeten +infinitive", not "zou moeten hebben +past participle", as the translation of "should have"...

http://www.dutchgrammar.com/en/?n=Verbs.Re24

So this sentence would be:
Je had die vogel moeten zien!

Is this correct?

[Raahiba]

Yes, that's what I wrote (and it's correct). They're both good options.

[Sean654321]

Why is "JIJ zou die vogel moeten hebben gezien" not accepted?

[El2theK]

It is, only not for a listening exercise due to the difference in pronunciation.

[Sean654321]

I don't think it was for a listening exercise though...

[AvshalomHalutz]

Why is "Je ZOU die vogel moeten zien" not accepted? I thought this whole chapter was on zou...

[Raahiba]

That's a different tense: 'You should see that bird'.

'Je zou die vogel moeten hebben gezien' = 'You should have seen that bird'