"I had given you time."

Translation: Jag hade gett dig tid.

[RJDaae]

What is the different between 'jag hade givit dig tid' and 'jag hade gett dig tid' (both are accepted answers)?

[ilmolleggi]

I don't know but my guess is "givit" is more old fashioned and reltaes to the infinitive form "giva" and the present "giver"

[Arnauti]

That's correct, givit feels more old fashioned but there's no difference in meaning, it's just an older form of the same verb. (the infinitive and present sound even more old fashioned).

[joelpet]

Couldn't "Jag gav dig tid" also be correct even though it's a different tense?

[Arnauti]

That would be I gave you time.

[Malgosia007]

Is "Jag hade gett tid till dig" also correct?

[Arnauti]

No, that sounds like 'I had given time to you' as if you had wrapped it in a package and given it as a gift somehow.

[EvelynOlson0]

Why not 'Jag hade gett ni tid'?

[Arnauti]

ni is the subject form but since you give something to someone, you need to use the object form er instead: Jag hade givit er tid.
Compare: "You gave I/me time" in English.

[Azuricet]

Why 'gång' is not allowed here ?

[devalanteriel]

gång is time as in one time, two times, three times...