"Han tar med sig barnen."

Translation: He is bringing the children.

[eac5137]

Hmm how do I know if he is bringing or taking them since "tar med sig" could mean both?

[devalanteriel]

You can't really, so we accept both options.

Do note, though, that it's "takes" in the "takes with him" rather than "grabs" sense.

[MihailDimitrov]

He takes with him the children is marked wrong. -_-

[MaranataMan]

That's not idiomatic English.

[Antonio_Sou]

Portuguese speakers confused by this may associate 'tar' with the english 'take', and 'tar med sig' with the portuguese 'trazer'.

You'll notice 'tar med sig' sounds a lot like 'trazer consigo' or 'trazer com ele próprio', which is ofcourse redundant in the portuguese language, but it allows for immediate assimilation.

You can then use this to help you assimilate other swedish verbs that use this type of construction.

[CapdeBurro]

Since you like using definite form instead of possessive, does this mean that they're his children?

[Arnauti]

Yes, the most likely interpretation here (and an accepted translation) is that they are his (own) children. It doesn't have to be, but that's what people will assume if you say this with no context.

[ZorbaTHut]

Is there a non-explicit way to say/imply "he brings children that are not his"?

[martin.mk]

Yes, just like in English: "he brings children" instead of "he brings THE children".

"Han tar med sig barn" vs "Han tar med sig barnen"

[rach_jules]

what is the difference between 'tar med sig' and 'har med sig'?
How interchangeable are they?

[Yerrick]

That's literally "take with (his/her/its)self" and "have with (his/her/its)self". The difference between going and being.

[mizholyday]

how do I know whether its "child" or "children"? aren they both "barn"?

[theredcebuano]

Just to clarify, you'll know if it's one child if it has "ett," and many if it doesn't. Barnet would be singular as well, while Barnen would be plural

[streek405]

Sorry if this has already been asked, but is there a case where you would ONLY say "tar" and not "tar med sig/mig/dig"?

[devalanteriel]

Not really if you mean "bring". But if you mean "take", then yes, most of the time.

[Stotty6]

Is there any implied direction with "ta med"? In English you "bring here" and "take there". Would you have to add hit or dit to the end of this sentence to give it a direction? "Han tar med sig barnen hit" would be "he brings his children here" and "han tar med sig barnen dit" would be "he takes his children there" perhaps?

[MaranataMan]

These are valid constructions as far as I can ascertain. (Not a native)

[ZacharyHin2]

would han tar med honom barnen also work?

[Berniebud]

No. You have to use "Sig".

"Ta med honom" means "Bring him", referring to someone else.

[tigerears]

Is there a difference in Swedish between 'he brings the children' and 'he takes the children'? I know that there is tension between British and American English with regards to bring/take, and would appreciate some clarification.

[Zmrzlina]

Yes, with "ta med (sig)" and "ta" respectively. In certain contexts, "ta" might work on its own, but it can sound very worrying to say that he takes the children if not used right.

[Kyrstellaine]

"He takes his children with" was not accepted, tho it's the way anyone in Minnesota would say it.

[devalanteriel]

I think that's a bit too regional to accept.

[dark_peppermint]

I am in the same situation in Missouri haha, only I used "He brings with his children."
I began to question if slapping a "with" onto the verb was grammatically "wrong" in English, so I did a quick search online and ended up finding this cool webpage that calls it the "V with construction" https://ygdp.yale.edu/phenomena/come-with // posting just in case some one else gets hung up on the same thing