"Hon antar att vi har fel."

Translation:She assumes that we are wrong.

January 7, 2015



Why "har" instead of "är"? She assumes we have wrong???

November 8, 2015


The guy said up there: "har fel" for people, "är fel" for things.

November 29, 2015


How is 'she is assuming' wrong? Instead it corrects to 'she assumes'.

March 14, 2015


Isn't to assume one of the stative verbs which can't be dynamic (in the -ing form)? I'm no native speaker, but I had the topic stative and dynamic words some weeks ago.

May 1, 2015


The things I'm learning about English are almost as interesting as the Swedish. I would say that I generally (or usually? :-}) say "I assume that ...", but I wouldn't think twice if someone said "I am assuming that ..."

October 7, 2015


"To assume" can also mean several other things than its most common definition, which leads to constructs like "to assume responsibility" or "to assume the throne." It is possible to say, then, "I am assuming full responsibility for this situation."

In the sense of "to take for granted without evidence," which is the one in the original sentence, I would never say it with the progressive aspect. It sounds wrong to my native ears. I just wanted to clarify that there exist perfectly legitimate situations to use it as such.

February 12, 2016


I would say that in the sense of "to take for granted without evidence" you can use the form "assuming", but generally only in first person. This is not a grammatical rule, but rather something that is only really used like this. However, there are chances that it's dialectal...

May 2, 2016


I think it's more likely to be used in the second person, actually, and the examples I'm coming up are responses contrary to or confirming an initial statement. "But/So you're assuming that ... ?"

May 5, 2016


It can actually be used for any person or even without a direct subject i.e. "Assuming I make it on time, etc". It would be common to use this form in rhetorical questions as well. Obviously your example is correct, but only really works in an interrogative way, rhetorical or not. With first person it can be used in statements quite naturally.

May 5, 2016


Can "think" work here in place of "assume", or is antar specifically "suppose" or "assume"?

January 7, 2015


Yes, anta is specifically ’assume, suppose’ whereas think is either ’tycka, tänka, tro’ depending on context. Read more about which one to use here.

January 7, 2015


I need some English advice: What is the difference between assume, presume and suppose? In German "anta" is nearly the same: annehmen. ta = nehmen

January 13, 2016


In my experience, they are often used fairly interchangeably; although it isn't correct to do so. In all cases, you are thinking something is the case, the differences are: Assume - without proof Presume - based on probability Suppose - based on evidence or probability but without proof or certain knowledge

They also each have a second completely different definition. I'd never actually thought about the differences before (native English speaker).

January 15, 2016


Thank you!

January 15, 2016


There is a real difference but it is mostly ignored now and people generally use assume instead of presume.. Older people, or those who know the English language use them like this : You presume a fact, ie without proof You assume responsibility, control, a disguise

February 4, 2016


To say we are wrong, it's vi är fel cannot be accepted? To say something is wrong, do I always use have verb?

January 12, 2015


If somebody is wrong we use 'har', eg. Du har fel. If something is wrong we use 'är', eg. Något är fel.

January 25, 2015


Oh that clears everything. Thank you!!

January 28, 2015


Can "guess" work as well?

May 22, 2015


I think it should be accepted, but assumes and supposes are both closer and better translations.

May 22, 2015


English people don't say assume that. We just say assume.

July 22, 2019
Learn Swedish in just 5 minutes a day. For free.