"A fost carne la prânz."

Traducere: There was meat for lunch.

[GeorgeSteriade]

La "there was meat for lunch" se poate folosi si it was meat for lunch ?

[ady2006ady]

Da

[alexandru23354]

There was meat at lunch

[Petronela279569]

At indica locul deci nu ar fi corect.

[GabrielNis12]

Mie mi-a acceptat si "There was meat at lunch".

[panamirela1]

There was meat at the lunch

[moisipaul]

Cand folosesc were si cand folosesc was????

[Nadia315508]

"was "il folosesti pentru persoana a-I-a si a -III-a singular, iar "were" pentru restul

[Veronica6747]

Was= a fost
Were= au fost
Nu are legătură cu persoana I, a II-a sau a III-a. E vorba de singular sau plural
Exemplu
I was here= Eu eram aici (singular)
We were here= Noi eram aici (plural)
La fel și când e vorba de altceva
Exemplu
The pen was there (singular)
The books were there (plural)

[MarianSima3]

Am învatat ca ..(la )..se traduce at...nu ..For ...(.în traducere la acesta lectie