It isn't. I typed "Tomorrow she will arrive to Paris" and the answer should be "... get to Paris". August 31, 2017
I have struggled with this one too, but "come" and "arrive" can have different meanings. When saying someone will "come to" a place it normally implies that you yourself are at that place. "Arrive at/in" does not carry this additional meaning. Other times, however, the two words are synonymous, especially when used with regards to time, eg "Summer will come/arrive" "You will come to/arrive at a decision." When translating "llegar" it is best to ask yourself: will there be a difference in meaning if I use "come" or "arrive?" If the answer is yes, then use "arrive." If the answer is no, then use whichever sounds more natural in English. EDIT As an additional note, I believe the usage of "llegar" and "venir" is comparable to our usage of "arrive" and "come," so if you wanted to say "Tomorrow she will come to Paris" you would say "Mañana ella vendrá a París." A native speaker may want to confirm this.
I think to come to and to go to are a little more focused on the process of movement between locations and arrive more focused on the one point of arrival. Of course get to, which is currently the answer shown above sort of covers it all. Get has probably more meanings and uses than most other verbs.
Because that's not what it means. It means she will arrive there, not go to you.
If following the "arrive" translation, in English we would say "arrive at Paris" not "arrive to Paris".
I'd say that "arrive to paris" is ok, but it is an awkward phrase. "arrive in Paris" is much more natural.
Just a note for non-English speakers: With certain verbs our future tense is often substituted by the present tense when accompanied by a future time reference. Eg "She arrives in Paris tomorrow" is a common way of saying "She will arrive in Paris tomorrow" when we are certain that event will occur.
Tomorrow she will arrive in Paris... and that is not right? I lost a heart as well...
Any reason the "ll" in ella is pronounced "y" while that of llegar is "j?" Is it random orvis there an underlying rule as t play?
Interestingly the SpanishDict.com speaker pronounces the two words the other way around: "llegar" with a "y" sound and "ella" with a "j". Maybe it's just a case of say what sounds right to you. I know there is also a lot of regional/international variation with the "ll" sound. Check out: http://www.forvo.com/word/llegar/#es You'll hear the "y" and "j" sounds and also "che".
I've noticed that duolingo doesn't give us much practice with this future tense above. We spend most of our time with Ir + a. Is that because Ir+a is used a lot more often?
I asked Mavry this elsewhere and he said that the "ir + a" form is much more commonly used.
¡Gracias, jellonz! I'll have to go elsewhere to learn the other future tense -- I'm already forgetting it! I need lots of repetitions. I'm pretty good with the "ir+a" by now.
De nada Susanna. The simple future conjugation is actually one of the easiest to learn because there are very few irregularities and the same ending applies to all verbs, be they -ar -ir or -er verbs. Just take the infinitive and add "é" yo, "ás" tú, "á" usted, él, ella, "emos" nosotros, "án" ustedes, ellos, ellas.
A nice way to remember this is a note from SpanishDict: "The simple future was originally formed by adding haber to an infinitive. (viajar he - travel I must, viajar has - travel you must, viajar ha - travel he must, etc.)." So, if you forget the correct ending just add the correct "haber" form, but replace the "h" with an inflection (which will naturally fall in the right place on the "emos" ending and therefore require no accent mark).
As an added note, Spanish present tense is also used more often than the future tense to express future events. The same usage applies in English. eg ""She arrives in Paris tomorrow"="Mañana ella llega a Paris." This tense can be used in both languages when the future event is a certainty, not a supposition or an intention. I'm not sure why DL doesn't teach this, probably to avoid confusion, but it is my understanding that Spanish uses this form as often as we do.
!Gracias, jellonz! I've been through the future section on duolingo, but I've been through so many verb sections I start to forget. Your clear, concise, and precise definitions and hints really help! Have a lingot!
Of course it is "arrive in Paris." But DL suggests that "llegar" can mean reach. So I tried "reach".........it has been a long trip for her. Oh well, DL has now taught be that "llegar" must never never be used to say Tomorrow she will llegar/reach Paris. Que trieste.
In English, the future may be communicated by the context of the sentence. For example, "Tomorrow she arrives at Paris." will be understood by every English speaker to be a reference to a future activity. It is the equivalent of "Tomorrow she will arrive at Paris."
When I click on the drop-down options for "llegara", it shows both "arrived" and "will arrive". How can that be?
Doesn't "a" means "to"? I answered "She will arrive to Paris" too, and was marked wrong. I don't get it. Can someone with a good heart please explain. Thank you in advance.
We just don't normally say She will arrive to Paris in English. She will get to Paris or she will arrive in Paris or She will reach Paris would be the normal English expressions. There is admittedly a somewhat fine line in determining a good translation which is literal enough to be demonstrating whatever Duo is trying to show and still is what one would say in English, but one of the common things you will find is that the preposition used in one language does not match the one used in the other.
Tomorrow she will arrive in paris is proper English. Llegar=arrive, reach, get
"She'll arrive to Paris tomorrow" is not accepted. Does anyone know why would this not be acceptable?
That doesn't sound natural at all to me, that might be why. The course is American English, so "arrive at" or maybe "arrive in".