Translation:Det er vores ost.
OK, ost is an -en noun. So why not DEN? Is it that we havent established that it is cheese until the end of the sentence?
Because 'det' is like saying 'that'. The gender of the noun does not affect 'det'.
OK, but just to hammer away at it...the Owl didn't use "that" in this example.
I realize that now.
A better explanation would be that it's 'det', until the gender of the noun is revealed.
"Det er vores ost"
"Den er også god"
Hej! My concern is about the relation between the noun (ost) and the subject (Det). I understand that since Det is referring to Osten, it should be DEN. Therefore now I don't get why it is det. :(