1. Forum
  2. >
  3. Topic: Spanish
  4. >
  5. "Yo haría una fiesta para mi …

"Yo haría una fiesta para mi cumpleaños si tuviera más amigos."

Translation:I would throw a party for my birthday if I had more friends.

August 12, 2013



This sentence actually cracks me up.


Plz tell me how you said this, whenever I say it, it just puts up .


May you never have an occasion to use it. :)


Por siempre solo...


Para siempre solo


conozco ese feel bro


I've only ever heard people say "make party" when it's their second language. It does sound strange in English.


why is not "make a party" allowed?


It's just not natural in English.


You are so right !!


I don't know why. I heard the two forms all the time.


That is what I put. Haría is "would do/make'. Habría is 'would have'. But I suppose that is used for different context. Habría tenido is 'would have had'. Don't know if that works either.


To have a party would be tener una fiesta. Haber is only have as the auxiliary verb of the perfect tenses.


"Make" just isn't the right translation of hacer, in this particular instance. "Throw a party" is more US, and "have party" is more UK. I'm in the UK btw. "Make a party" just cracks me up because it makes me think of Borat's deliberately broken English when he talks about "making sexytime" <3


Dang... "have a party", I meant to write.


you can't say make a party, but you can say have a party.


And throw a party.


True "haría" = "would do/make" Moreover, as is true for many verbs, there can be unique, implied meanings such as here where "haría una fiesta" would most closely translate to English as "would throw a party"


So, why is " I would have a party...." incorrect here? In another exercise a form of "hacer" was used in the Spanish sentence and in translation, "making a party" was deemed incorrect while "having" was the correct answer.


I do not know. I think it is O.K., but.........


I don't know. For me it is O.K.


Que lastima, la soledad!


It accepts "have a party", also


hacer una fiesta = have a party or throw a party


dar una fiesta = have a party, throw a party, give a party



That's just sad. :(


Aw, I'll be your friend.


Yep. This guy needs to learn that to have a friend, he needs to be one. So he should have the party anyway, invite a bunch of people and use the opportunity to work on his social skills! If you throw it, they will come...


Quite so, Otherwise it is self-fulfilling. Have a Lingot on me


I just read this on my birthday. Ouch! :-/


Duolingo getting relateable again...


And when this question pops up when you are all alone learning languages in your birthday...


Probably the saddest sentence on Duolingo


Duolingo is dark.


La historia de mi vida


El verbo ''to have'' también significa ''hacer''??????


Yes :-) Spanish "hacer" can be English "to do" or "to make".


llorar en español


Me too, buddy. Me too. sobs.


This is so sad Get more ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ friends


Forever alone anthem


I would give a party - is unacceptable!


I did not understand this sentence...


Obviously there is no context. But a possible context is someone who is making plans for their birthday. They say they would throw a party, but they don't have enough friends to make it work. The structure is relatively common. There are two clauses, but either can come first. One clause has a conditional tense and the other clause begins with if and contains a past subjunctive. The same structure exists in English, although it is often hard to recognize our subjunctive. But in this structure indicates a contrary to fact statement. There is an idiom/proverb in English which my mother used to say a lot. I translated it into Spanish early on so I could learn the Spanish structure. If wishes were horses, beggars would ride. Si deseos fueron caballos, los mendigos montarian


shouldn't this be "mis cumpleaños"


That's a great question, but no, not in this case. Cumpleaños is a Spanish compound which follows the regular rules for compound words. In Spanish compound words are formed by taking the third person singular form of a verb and combining it with the plural form of a noun. In this case you have comple from cumplir to fulfill and años years. This is not as obvious a combination for English speakers as many others.

Some other compound words like this are:

Lavaplatos - lava wash + platos dishes. Dishwasher

Lavarropas - lava wash + ropas clothes (the r is doubled here because an initial R has the rr sound) Clothes washer.

Parabrisas - para stop + brisas breezes. Windshield

Paraguas - para stop + aguas waters (second a dropped) Umbrella.

Abrelatas - Abre open + latas cans. Can opener.

Rascacielos - rasca scrape + cielo sky. Skyscraper.

There are many more.

As a rule, these nouns share a couple of characteristics. First, whether the noun portion of the word is masculine or feminine when separate, the compound word is masculine. And second, these words don't change in the plural. So mi cumpleaños is my birthday and mis cumpleaños is my birthdays. I learned these rules as having exceptions, but I don't think I know any that don't obey these rules.


tengo duelo del corazon


Me alegría de que hayas escrito en español. Permítame ayudarte con los detalles. Duelo es el verbo (I hurt). El sustantivo es dolor. Por consiguiente las dos posibilidades son así

Tengo dolor de cabeza (tener + sustantivo)

Me duele el corazón (pronomial verb construction like gustar)


So the sentence is in the indicative up until the word "haria," which was the trigger for the subjunctive mood (in this case), and then the past subjunctive form of tener. Does that sum it up accurately?


Not accurately) haría doesn't trigger past subj, words that do are the same as for the present subj. I suppose it's just the way to express the same thing as second conditional in English.

Spanish: Main - Conditional, Dependent - past subjunctive
English: Main - would + verb, Dependent - past simple/progressive

Furthermore, wiki tells that in English the past tense (simple past or past progressive) of the condition clause is historically the past subjunctive. In modern English this is identical to the past indicative, except in the first and third persons singular of the verb be, where the indicative is was and the subjunctive were. Considering this you can say that translation is literal)


i hate this chapter, I said " I would make a party", in the definitions, was marked wrong.


I find it interesting that some of the responses on the Duolingo Ap are not the same as the ones on Duoling on line. That does not make sense to me.


Has "duolingo" never heard of rent a party"? I'm up for it!!


How about "mis cumpleaños?"


"Cumpleaños" can be used as singular and plural, but why would you use the plural here? You can't throw one single party for multiple birthdays.


Y i would make no es haría también? Que lio


I got marked off for saying mis cumpleaños instead of mi cumpleaños. I could have sworn I saw "mis" before or used it and was not marked off. Besides, it's a plural noun like mis pantalones.


What am i doing wrong


Everything, Kathleen. You're doing everything wrong.


Why does it have to be I'd instead of i had


Instead she had to spend her birthday reading for Duolingo.


Why not "birthday party" instead of "party for my birthday" ?


I hadn't even gotten to más amigos when Duo decided I'd said the sentence correctly and confirmed it - stopping it's recording short of my finishing the sentence. I'm not complaining, just wondering what's going on? Must be something like, if you get 90% or so correct enough, Duo marks it as completed correctly. So, if your pronunciation is very good for the first part of the sentence, you don't have to finish it, because you've already gotten a 90 on the "test".


I have, on more than one occasion, said literally nothing and been greeted with success. In truth, the microphone exercises are a farce.


I would do a birthday party if I had more friends seems a reasonable English translation


You do not have a party FOR your birthday when it is YOU that is to be celebrated.


I don't know whether it is ego, a lack of true friends, or just wanting to be in control, but I know plenty of people who have thrown their own birthday parties.


por qué throw y no have o make


Have a party does not mean that you are throwing it necessarily, although it can. Make us the direct translation, but we don't say that. I have heard Let's make it a party, but that assumes taking an existing or scheduled gathering into a party.


I would have had a party, seems more natural to me, to throw a party is more western Atlantic, I am eastern. Duolingo should accommodate us too.


It doesn't have quite the same meaning. Tense always matters. I would have had a party means that the decision is past. This is about what someone is thinking about doing for their birthday which hasn't happened yet. That is a situational difference, not a difference in regional speech.


.....And it allows 'Do a party' There is always a literal translation from language to language if you think about it hard enough, this question was translated to English by someone who is not a fluent English speaker.


That's a common expression, at least in American English. The Spanish translates directly as make a party, which I don't think I have ever heard, at least not commonly.



Thats realy sad...


Hold a party, do a party, make a party. have a party - they all can be used according to the English subset and/or English geography


How is "if I would have more friends" wrong?


If I would have more friends is apparently attempting to be a conditional statement, but is grammatically incorrect in both languages actually. This sentence is actually the same in both languages. The issue with the English is that the English subjunctive is almost invisible in most verbs and person conjugations. And it isn't therefore taught very effectively. But English definitely has a subjunctive mood, although used less frequently than in Spanish, and this is a good example. It is the classic case of a conditional/subjunctive statement where the subjunctive portion describes the condition for the conditional portion to be completed. When the subjunctive portion is in the past tense, it indicates a contrary-to-fact condition. We know from this sentence that the speaker is not having a party and does not have more (meaning enough) friends. When you get to that meaning from these words, you know to use the subjunctive mood.


I cant find "haria" in my verb conjugation ....someone please help me here....


Ah yes. It's one of the most irregular conditional conjugations that there are. It's from hacer to make or to do.


"I would make a party" why didn't accept?


It's not a common English expression. We have parties and we throw parties. Throw is what you say to definitely communicate that you are hosting and putting it all together


Since it's plural, shouldn't it be "mis cumpleaños"?


Good question, but no. Birthdays come one at a time for us all. But cumpleaños is an example of the most common form of Spanish compound word. There are a few exceptions but most take the third person singular present indicative form of the verb and the plural form of the noun. This makes a compound word which is masculine and doesn't alter form to make the plural. So here we have cumple from the verb cumplir to complete and años which is years. Your birthday is when you complete years. Other examples include

Para (parar) + aguas = paraguas (second a dropped) stop waters =umbrella

Lava (lavar) + platos = Lavaplatos wash plates= dishwasher

Abre (abrir) + latas = Abrelatas can opener

Para + caídas = paracaidas stop falls parachute

Saca (sacar) + corchos = sacacorchos take out corks corkscrew.

There are a few that do take the singular form like guarapelo (guard hair which is a locket). But most take the above form.


instead I'm on duolingo...


Why not "I would do a party for my birthday, if would have more friends"?


I think if you are going to translate hacer literally make a party might be better, but neither expression is at all common in English. You can have a party, but even that doesn't always mean that you are the initiator and the host. Throw in the verb we use that definitely means that, so the common for common convention would make that the best translation.


How can the answer be ‘if I had more bud.’ I put friends but obviously they have ‘buds’


You could write a whole paragraph about parties and the double entendre of having bud vs having buds. More buds bring more bud, but eventually it all goes up in smoke.


Neither of the hints above the answer use the word "throw a party" . I used "make" like the hints and got it wrong


If you throw a party, you may also do it "on" your birthday


While that is true, it is not what the sentence says


My point is that the preposition ON, rather than FOR, should be considered as common English and allowed as okay by the computer .


The problem comes when you seem to think it would not be common for that to be said in Spanish. Saying on my birthday is just as common in Spanish, but that would be en mi cumpleaños. But that's not what was said here. Many people move their birthday parties to the weekend, so it might not be what the speaker means either. There is language that is somewhat ambiguous and can therefore have a couple of different accurate translations, but this is not one. The purpose of translation on Duo is to accurately reflect what is being said in Spanish within common English grammar and syntax. Your change does not accurately reflect what the sentence said, and the speaker could have easily have altered the same word in Spanish to get to that meaning. So the fact that it is common in English, but neither more common nor more correct is irrelevant.


Is amigas incorrect?


That would tend to be correct only under special circumstances, like if a young girl were talking who was having a single sex birthday party. Most adults would have at least one male among the friends they would invite to a birthday party, and it only takes one to make the whole group amigas feminine.


I would do= yo haría - I would have= yo tendría ... Tomar tu opcion. Cualquiera de las dos funcionaría.


'La soledad es solo un reflexión'


Por que no, " I would make a party..."????


It's just how the Spanish say it. In England we 'throw' a party, so it's a similar thing. I believe the Spanish also use dar as in to 'give' a party.


This is an example of Duo's common for common convention. While it is a possible English sentence, the verb make is seldom if ever used about parties. We have parties or we throw parties. I know at one point Duo didn't accept have either, which I think was a mistake. I think have might be accepted now, but I am not sure. But Duo is especially sensitive about a direct translation of the commonest verb phrase in Spanish into something that is not common in English. The issue is not simply that the sentence sounds a little odd in English. Duo has many sentences with odd translations meant to illustrate something mostly about Spanish. But in addition to standard expressions like Greetings there are certain verbs that are used with certain nouns. These may sound idiomatic in one language and more denotative in the other, but when you have a standard expression in EITHER language which is somehow metaphorical or idiomatic like throw a party, pitch a tent or draw a bath (all English expressions, though Spanish has its own) Duo wants those to be the go to translations. To the extent that the direct translation is at all possible in English, people often object. But learning a language means both understanding and being able to produce correct, fluid speech using the appropriate common construction. If you simply translate the sentence without looking for a more common way to say it, you are more likely to try a direct translation the other way when talking about throwing a party. No se puede tirar una fiesta. Saying tirar una fiesta makes no sense, so Duo want to cement the link between throw a party and hacer una fiesta. As I say, I believe have a party should also be allowed.


Right in the feels


Always used habria instead of haria, which mean about the same thing, but I was marked wrong.


They don't really mean the same thing. They are two different verbs. Yo haría literally means I would make. It is from the verb hacer. Habria is from the verb Haber. Haber is only used as an auxiliary verb in all of its persons except for third person singular, where it is always used without a subject or subject pronoun and is translated with There. So it would translate to There would be. While the meanings may be similar in this case, they certainly don't make the same sentence.


I think you mistyped and meant to put "Yo haría..." in your second sentence.


Thanks. Corrected.


De nada. :o)


Hi Rob, Habría does not mean "would have" in the same way as tendría. Habría In the context you suggest is "There would be a party..." not quite the same as "I would have a party..." or "I would throw a party...".


This horrible phrase keeps refusing to take THE EXACT answer it wants and keeps locking me out of finishing assignments. SO frustrating. Any advice on how to get this to work??


Duo does refuse to accept correct answers from time to time. Often it is a random one up error. But very rarely it lasts a while session. If it doesn't work, exit totally out of Duo, reboot your device and try again. I have never had a random problem that survives that. Occasionally a more permenant error creeps in when Duo is updating which answers it accepts, but when that happens everyone complains, and I haven't heard about one of those errors in a while.


Would hiciera instead of haria also be possible?


No. This sentence is almost the definition of the conditional. I would... if. The if clause contains the CONDITION under which the second clause is true. And the first clause in the conditional dictates that the condition be in the past subjunctive. The present subjunctive adds doubt to the statement, but the past subjunctive is most often a contrary to fact statement.

The majority of the time you see the subjunctive it is required due to some elements in the sentence's construction. Some of these would be subjunctive in English and some not. But the sentences where someone voluntarily adds the subjunctive just to add doubt to the sentence will not look subjunctive in English. They will be more like the sentence that Duo recently added that caused such confusion, "I might have done it" where the purpose of adding might was not to translate a Spanish word, but to "translate" the effect of adding the subjunctive where it isn't required by the nature of the sentence. So Duo's translation was simply, Yo lo hiciera.


¡Bien por usted! No tengo amigos.


Why is it sad? I find friends to be a pain and cut them all out of my life apart from one. More friends = More probkems.


If you hit the speak button immediately, it keeps talking and it'll do the exercise for you.


Este muy triste


Esto es muy triste. You need the neuter form esto since this is a complete circumstance which has no gender. You also need a verb.


I said "make a party" and it marked me wrong


Had you ever said make a party before? Duo uses common for common translation for set expressions. Spanish uses hacer + noun a lot, where we say something different. One part of language fluency is automatically making these standard changes between the English way and the Spanish way. While that certainly involves learning a lot of vocabulary for direct translation, it also involves translating set expressions in a less direct way to other set expressions. Many set expressions can be obvious. Greetings, expressions of concern, what you say when someone sneezes or as a toast are quite often extremely idiomatic. But there are a lot of small phrases too, like throw a party, set the table (or lay if you are British) and 100 others that Duo is trying to teach you the set expression for in Spanish.


I feel you, bro. XD


Wow, this is a sad Duo sentence.


I have never thrown a party!!! Given plenty but never thrown...


Que triste! At least your cat is not in the freezer or you stopped feeding your dog. Got to count our blessings.


I haven't seen an exercise with a cat in the freezer. But I have seen the one that went something like Él daba comida a su perro. That particular sentence has crystallized my need to preach the word of the true imperfect. (OK, so I may be slightly over dramatic). But I have always objected to the use of "used to" with the imperfect for the simple fact that, along with meaning that the action was repeated or routine, it also implies that it no longer happens. The fact that everyone was bemoaning the fact that the man had stopped feeding his dog. That is not what that sentence is saying. The reason the imperfect is called imperfect is that the action or state described by the verb is not necessarily complete or over. For example, if you have gone to church every week for your whole life, you may talk about a time in the past where it was significant that you went to church every week, and therefore use the past tense. That is exactly when you use the imperfect, because the imperfect does NOT imply that you no longer go.


I would make.....


" To have a party,' and to "throw a party," mean exactly the same.


I would hold a party....is also accepted.


I would hold a party... is also accepted.


Yo tambien. Estoy triste.


The English translation for this sentence is very awkward


'I would do a party on my birthday if I had more friends'is not accepted. Why?


We don't say "do a party". We say "throw a party" or "have a party".


When referring to having or giving a party, is it more common in Spanish to use a form of Dar?


Yes. Dar una fiesta would be the common phrase. But Spanish does seem to like some round about phrases with hacer, and I think this is more illustrating a tendency in a simpler construction than teaching the phrase.


(Inserte canción del meme del ataúd). :'v


Should it be MIS cumpleanos ?


No it shouldn't. Cumpleaños is singular. there are a few words which are combination nouns which look plural but are in fact singular. Paraguas is another example: me olvidé de mi paraguas.


To me more specific, these words can be either singular or plural - they don't change in the plural - but the meaning here (as well as the use of mi) is singular. These words are created in a recognizable way. They use the third person singular conjugation of a verb and a plural noun, although there are a few examples with singular nouns. Those that don't end in s do take it in the plural, but there aren't many of them. So here you have cumple from the verb cumplir meaning fulfill or complete and años meaning years. Another thing that should be said about these nouns, although not surprising here, is they are all masculine, regardless of the gender of the noun component. This seems to be an active method of word creation, since many native speakers still find new ones. Some other examples

Lavaplatos - washes plates

Abrelatas - opens cans

Parabrises - stops breezes (windshield)

Quitamanchas - removed stains

Rascacielos - scrapes skies

Salvavidas - saves lives

I'm not saying you can necessarily guess, but many of those that do use a singular noun do seem to make some sense that way. They tend to be designed or used for one in particular.

Corteceped - cuts lawn

Cubrecama - covers bed

Quitasol - removes sun

Guardapelo- keeps hair (locket)


On a whim I tried “yo tengria= I would have” Is tengria even a real word? It's real close to tendria, which means the same thing , so maybe the computer just misunderstands.


No there is no tengria. The g only goes in the yo present tense and in the present subjunctive that is normally formed using the yo present root. The conditional is normally formed from the whole infinitive, but tener is quite irregular.

Learn Spanish in just 5 minutes a day. For free.