"The bread is not human."

Translation: Brødet er ikke menneskeligt.

[JesseAshmore]

I have no idea why this is a sentence...

[ElliottPet4]

Same reason as a turtle reading tea, or a bear handing beer to a duck that's reading a newspaper, or maybe it is saving a horse.

Because it can be.

[blomstredepige]

Something by Terry Pratchett maybe? :D

[Ozymandias0]

How dare you Duo. The bread has feelings as well.

[Rumbasta]

Brødet er måske menneskeligt.
The bread is maybe human????

[Faizyrooma4]

I think that the correct word order would be "Måske er brødet menneskeligt"

[Susann.e23]

I think both is correct.

[JeremyButt3]

This sentence is totally breadist, and I am outraged.

[PremixedRyan]

bold of you to assume the bread's identity

[webgenie]

Well just try to explain that to the Pillsbury dough boy! Break the poor thing's heart!
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ynrsuuDZcCg/hqdefault.jpg

[daniel456983]

?? Hvad er det sætningen

[ChrisSteve648506]

Not the killer bread again!

[Damir646957]

Why a «t» at the end of menneskeligt and not just menneskelig ?

[JeremyButt3]

Because 'brød' is neuter. This is a pretty basic rule.

As Teach Yourself Danish puts it: 'If the adjective follows the noun, separated from it by a form of the verb to be, as in the rose is red, the adjective is inflected in Danish. Describing a common gender noun in the singular, it does not add an ending. Referring back to a neuter gender noun in the singular, it adds -t.'

Elsworth, Bente. John Murray Press. Kindle Edition.