Good job :).
Here are some corrections (I'm not fluent either though, so I hope I got them all right):
- Jag kan inte se*
- inte se mig att älska någon* (I don't think inte goes with ingen.. inte nåt, inte nån, etc..)
- se mig att älska feels weird but I'm not fluent... I might try "jag kan inte tro att jag skulle älska nån annan förutom dig". That sounds bad to me too though and not close to the song lol.
- förutom dig*
- hela mitt liv* kanske? är inte säker
- älskling, kommer himlen*
I think your use of the future tense was correct.
You're right, 'hela mitt liv' is definitely correct, I just remember it now in the lullaby "Jag har aldrig sett en orm".
I still have issues with the syntax, ❤❤❤❤❤❤, I need to abolish thinking in English I think!
tack så mycket for all of your input! =)
PS- About inte and ingen, it was deliberate as it is a double negative in the song but I don't know if that works in Swedish!
As a general emotion, glad is more for the situations when you'd be likely to laugh. "merry" could often fit here. lycklig is more about a general feeling of fulfillment, "joy" etc. – But the expression jag är glad att … is pretty much like the English 'I'm glad that …'
In this case, I'd say there's a pretty big difference between them being lyckliga tillsammans ('happy' fits well) vs glada tillsammans (sounds much less permanent).
Am I right in thinking that lycklig refers to a general state of happiness, which is not a rush of emotions, but something constant and consistent, and glad would be a non-permanent state of happiness, which is a rush of emotions and mostly caused by some particular reason?
If two people are living (generally) happily together, we would use lycklig(t) when referring to how they live, and if we want to describe someone feeling joy from the work they've done on some day, we would use glad, right?