"What are our choices?"

Translation: Vad har vi för val?

[Jonathan606349]

Is this better/more idiomatic than "vilka val har vi?"

[Zmrzlina]

Yes.

[Weltkulturerbe2]

But "Vilka val har vi" was not accepted

[BethSager3]

Terrible hints on this one.

[kenmatin]

why våra instead of vårt? before it used ditt val

[Berniebud]

You would only use "Vårt" if it was singular. "What is our choice?".

Here, it's plural "Choices", so you would use the plural form "Våra".

[ninady1980]

Does this mean 'What choices do we have?' or 'Which ones have we chosen?'? Or could it be both?

[JoaoFreireBR]

Is "Vad för val har vi?" a possible construction?

[Steph.Ro]

I put that, too, and it was marked wrong, though I would see vad för val as the question word/phrase in first position and my verb is still second. I think it should be accepted and reported it.

Having said that, I might be wrong and would totally like someone to explain why!

Edit: my grammar book says "Vad may be separated from för by other words such as a finite verb, subject, etc." so I'm even more confused now as to why Vad för val har vi? is not accepted...

[Steph.Ro]

I'm now a few lessons further on and just came across "What gas is it?"

Both "Vad är det för gas?" and "Vad för gas är det?" are accepted there. I conclude that "Vad för val har vi?" should be allowed here.

[James704885]

What do we have for choices seems the more logical English translation

[zOJHoqLx]

Vad är våra optioner?

[MaranataMan]

I believe the correct sentence would be Vilka är våra optioner