"Ördek bende."
Translation:I have the duck.
22 Comments
- 10
- 10
"Benim ördeğim var" translates as "I have a duck". So, it wouldn't be grammatically incorrect but it's just not the correct translation in this instance.
Imagine someone is asking "Ördek kimde?-Who has the duck?" and the reply would be "Ördek bende.-I have the duck." Benim ördeğim var would not work. Does that help?
I love when the question I was going to ask has already been answered :)
- 17
- 12
- 7
- 6
- 5
- 4
- 3
- 3
Does Benim ördeğim var also mean 'I have the duck'? I know that 'I have the duck' is 'Ördek bende', but is there any other way to say 'I have the duck'?
- 13
- 13
- 11
- 11
- 8
- 8
- 8
- 7
Why exactly is it the duck and not a duck? Is it because the duck is in the subject position? How would "I have a duck." normally be said? Could I say "Bir ördek bende."?
- 10
- 10
Please read over the previous question thread for this sentence, I think that'll clarify things for you.
- 24
- 22
- 22
- 22
- 22
- 20
- 20
- 19
- 19
- 19
- 18
- 17
- 17
- 16
- 16
- 16
- 16
- 15
- 14
- 14
- 12
- 12
- 9
- 8
- 8
- 8
- 4
- 64
It didn't for me. I can follow that but ıt doesn't seem to cover every sıtuatıon.
- 24
- 22
- 22
- 22
- 22
- 20
- 20
- 19
- 19
- 19
- 18
- 17
- 17
- 16
- 16
- 16
- 16
- 15
- 14
- 14
- 12
- 12
- 9
- 8
- 8
- 8
- 4
- 64
How do you say I have a duck when the duck does not belong to you? Benim ördeğim var really means my duck exists doesn't it? So it can't refer to someone elses duck can it? Because you can say I have a duck and mean I found this duck wandering about and it is here with me but I don't know which particular duck it is so I am not able to refer to it as the duck.
- 10
- 10
"Benim örneğim var" means "I have a duck". It can't refer to someone else's duck as the possessive ending -im indicates " my".
For the example you give, you can say "bende bir ördek var". Please don't forget that you'll never say these sentences on their own, so the context will always help you fortify what the sentence means.
- 24
- 22
- 22
- 22
- 22
- 20
- 20
- 19
- 19
- 19
- 18
- 17
- 17
- 16
- 16
- 16
- 16
- 15
- 14
- 14
- 12
- 12
- 9
- 8
- 8
- 8
- 4
- 64
Thank you, this was really confusing, mainly because I couldn't tell where the definite article was coming from as opposed to an indefinite one. Context is everything!
- 10
- 2
- 2
What is the literal Translation of this sentence? Something like "The duck is at me" ?
- 13
- 13
- 11
- 11
- 8
- 8
- 8
- 7
Yep, exactly. A lot of languages lack a verb "to have" and use a similar construction like this one ("X is on/at/with me."). Other examples are Russian and Irish.
- 14
- 10
- 10
- 9
- 8
Actually RU uses both: у(with) меня(me) есть(have) утка(duck). Also it is possible to say "я(I) имею(own) утку(duck)
- 12
- 9
- 8
- 7
- 6
This is one of the times when you try to understand the explanation, but instead just nod your head and say "böyle"... :-)
- 13
- 13
- 11
- 11
- 8
- 8
- 8
- 7
What is "Tu Sub"? But I guess the answer is yes, because the duck is the subject of this phrase and is definite (otherwise a different structure would be used). So yes, "the" is needed, because that's how in English definiteness is expressed.