Swedish vikings established the Rus dynasty at Old Novgorod and at Kiev, marrying into Byzantine royalty. Many vikings joined the Varangian Guard of Byzantium. http://www.ancient-origins.net/history-important-events/vikings-byzantium-varangians-and-their-fearless-conquests-003136
Viking helmets did not have horns. The vikings used helmets like the Roman helmets, which became familiar to them.
Vikings were aware of a circle route down rivers (with some portaging) from Old Novgorod to Kiev, then down to the Crimea and to Byzantium, then through the Mediterranean and up the Atlantic coast to Scandinavia.
"Make a Viking Airlines reservation and find some amazing deals with discounted Viking Airlines tickets at Alternative Airlines. Viking Airlines flies to many destinations offering a cost effective and safe service to all its passengers. Let Alternative Airlines help find you cheap Viking Airlines tickets and make international and domestic flight reservations on Viking Airlines today." https://www.alternativeairlines.com/viking-airlines
Might be a dumb question (I haven't researched Vikings at all), but were there no female Vikings? (BTW, reported it in a trouble call, but I haven't been receiving email notifications of responses to questions/comments since about July 4; hopefully fixed soon because I'd like to know what your thoughts are...)
I wonder why Vikings is capitalized in the English translation? (choose the tile question) If they were a group named after a specific region/proper noun (Romans, Argonauts, e.g.) I could understand that. But why for capitalize Vikings when it's not the usual for a group? (druids, wizards, e.g) formidable though they may be :)
ja, jag vet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcYWCu2qxIE it was not so long ago there still were vikingarna but no more:
Because 'viking' here is a noun referring to a group of people rather than an individual.
It's akin to saying "Do you know who a Swedish person is?" - It doesn't make sense because we're not referring to an individual.
You could say "Do you know who Ragnar Lothbrok is?" or "Do you know what a viking is?", but you can't combine the two.
EDIT: I guess you could combine the two in a sense, but it would have to be referring to a group and couldn't be in a non-plural tense. eg:
"Do you know who 'The Vikings' are?"
In English, the word "Viking" refers to historical Swedish/Scandivanian people who lived about 1000 years ago. They are of particular historical interest to English-speaking people since they mostly conquered England and took up residence there, lived with and married with the residents of England and heavily influenced the English language. But does the Swedish work "viking" mean the same thing? I suspect that it does.
Since it's the 21st century, I checked it out on Wikipedia and got this:
"The Vikings were seafaring Scandinavians engaged in exploring, raiding and trading in waters and lands outside of Scandinavia from the eighth to eleventh centuries."
I am sure that Swedish children learn about this in history class, and I find history interesting, so please feel free to elaborate if you feel like it!
Sorry, thats not strictly true. If you look at etymology sites, the British language is still predominantly anglo saxon origin in terms and most words have a very close tie to old English which is AS. Vikings contributed to the language but it wasnt "heavily" influencing when it remains predominantly anglo saxon germanic origins. The thing is, we are still talking the Germanic language family so they were always closely related and similar in words and grammar anyway.
Secondly, viking only refers to a subset of the people not all the scandinavian people. Vikingar was a verb meaning to go raiding. Those who stayed at home and farmed were not vikings. Those who went raiding, were.
The Danelaw was about a third to a half of the country so not really "mostly" conquered. However, their ferocity and skill did mean other remaining kingdoms capitulated and paid the Danegeld to them in order not to be conquered.
Its of interest to most Brits because we still have the DNA in our blood. And there are still links to that part of our history. For example, place names can often given an indicator of the people who settled the area. Chester is an indicator there was a roman fort or settlement in that place. Ham is an indicator it was an anglo saxon settlement.
We just learned the word by for village as by... and if you think of a lot of towns that would be within what was the Danelaw, for example, Grimsby, Derby, Rugby.... the by is an indicator this was originally a viking settlement. Its not 100% thats how it is all the time, but its a good rule of thumb to get an idea of who and when a place was settled.
No, though the course gets large amounts of error reports for sentences like these that say e.g. "Do you know what is a viking?" But you need regular word order for these subclauses, both in questions and in statements.
- What is a viking?
- I know what a viking is.
- Do you know what a viking is?