"Jeg vil tilbake."

Translation:I want to go back.

May 23, 2015



So if "vil" can mean "want" by itself, what was up with the whole "vil ha" thing a few lessons ago? Is there any way to tell which situations need "vil ha" and which only need "vil"?


'vil ha' means specifically 'want to have' and is followed by a noun e.g. 'Jeg vil ha kaffe' = 'I want [to have] coffee' 'vil' is followed by a verb e.g. 'Jeg vil spise' = 'I want to eat' or (as in this case) a preposition with the verb implied 'Jeg vil tilbake' = 'I want to go back'


Ah, that makes sense. Thank you!


He must have seen the bears on the bicycles...


Folks, we with internet translator made little lyrics, can you find mistakes if tgere are? Ha en god dag!

Når dere snakker på engelsk Om bjørnene på sykler De hører deg, sorg fyller dem, Så bare snakker ikke.

Når dere snakker den på norsk De vil forstå stor det Så ta en hyggelig smørbrød Og bare holde kjeft.

Hvis du vil snakker på russisk Deretter glem det, takk. Fordi de bor i mange land Og kjenner mange språk.


Ok so according the the verbix.com norwegian section, future tense can be used using vil. I will go = Jeg vil gå I know that Jeg skal gå also means I will/shall go and I have heard that using vil also means with intent, i.e. I want to go but surely this translation should also include I will go back?


In this case the only verb in the Norwegian sentence is 'vil', so it's the main verb in the sentence rather than an auxiliary verb to 'go'. On its own 'å ville' means 'to want/to wish', so this sentence can translate to variations of "I want(/wish) to go back(/return)".

If the sentence had been "Jeg vil dra(/reise/gå) tilbake", then yes, it could have been translated in that way as well. Saying "Jeg kommer til å dra(/reise/gå) tilbake" would still be a more common and less ambiguous way of expressing it though. "Jeg vil returnere" = "I will(/want to) return" is yet another way to express the same thing.


It can mean "I want to go back", "I will go back", and it could also mean "I shall go back", but the last one depends on the context. So you are right. Edit: All of them depends on the context I guess, so if you wanted to be sure that people understand you if you want to say "I want to go back" (You want to, but you aren't saying whether you are going to or not) you should say "Jeg skulle ønsket at jeg kunne gå tilbake" = "I should have wanted that I could go back" (Horrible english, I know). If you say this, people will think that there is somehing that makes it hard, or that something is holding you back from going back or something though.


After reading all the explanations, I still don't get why there is no second verb after "vil", I find this sentence missing something. I know that "vil" means "want", so this sentence sounds to me like "I want back". I feel the right way to say "i want to go back" would be something like "jeg vil gå tilbake". Or is the movement verb "gå" implied in "vil"? Thank you in advance.


Not a native, but here are my 2 cents anyway: I think the movement is implied in "tilbake". It's a compound word: til + bake, with "til" meaning "to" and "bake" meaning "back".

You are right that "I want back" doesn't really sound like good english, but you shouldn't make the mistake of trying to translate word for word. English and Norwegian are two different languages, so what may sound off in one language is perfectly fine in the other. That being said, the literal (and very off sounding) translation would be "I want to-back".


Because tilbake also means return. So jeg (I) vil (want to) tilbake (return). Jeg vil tilbake = I want to return... aka I want to go back.


Are you saying that tilbake is a verb? Because I don't think it is.


What about 'I will come back'? Why is not correct?


That would be the translation of "Jeg vil komme tilbake".

"Vil" is the only verb in this sentence, which means that there's another verb omitted, and we only do that when it's used as a modal auxiliary verb, expressing want.


Could it be 'I want to come back'?


jeg vil å komme tilbake


'Jeg vil komme tilbake.' is a correct Norwegian sentence.

'I want to come back.' could be: 'Jeg ønsker å komme tilbake.' or 'Jeg har lyst til å komme tilbake.'


"I WILL BE BACK" is wrong...how comes ?!? :D


My understanding based on Deliciae's comments above is that if 'vil' is the only verb it has to mean 'want to' not 'will'. You might be able to say 'Jeg skal tilbake' for 'I will be back'.


I was in Terminator Mode ;)


" I will be back " was just marked correct for me , I guess they added that in there after


Yes, I entered "I'll be back!" (with a heavy austrian accent ;)) and it got accepted.


I'll be back worked for me


"I will return" was accepted for me. In Arnie-speak, that's a very deep "I'll be back" LOL


Wouldn't Arnie say: "jeg skal vær tilbake"?


Can this be used in a metaphorical sense? Like to express for example the wish to go back in time?


Is "tilbake" an adverb or an auxiliary verb?


Yeah im also wondering what it is..


I put "I will be back" and it was marked correct. Sooo is that how the Terminator would say it? Or would it be "Jeg kommer tilbake?" or something else?


I'll be back. - Terminator


Wouldn't "Jeg har lyst til å gå tilbake." make more sense?


Is "tilbake" a verb here?


No. "Vil" is a verb. Tilbake is a noun (a substantive, to be more precise).


"Tilbake" is not a noun, it is an adverb.


Bare hyggelig. :)


Hi. Im just trying to figure out the relationship between 'vil' with other words following it. What is 'tilbake' in this sentence? Is it a proberb, or what is it? The ' vil ha' sentences make me feel that another verb should follow 'vil' ( is there a rule in Norwegian) but, even though 'tilbake' translated as 'to GO back', it doesnt feel like a verb to me. But maybe I'm wrong..


If I'm not mistaken, tilbake is an adverb.


Build a time machine then.

Learn Norwegian (Bokmål) in just 5 minutes a day. For free.