"Qual è il cane?"
Translation:Which is the dog?
94 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
I translated "Qual è il cane?" as "Which dog is it?", which was marked as wrong. Is this not a correct translation? It means the same thing as the 'correct' answer of "Which is the dog?", and it sounds like more natural English to me.
Here it is important to note the function of the words. "Qual" is the interrogative pronoun, functioning as the subject of the sentence. "Cane" is the predicate nominative. The "è" between them functions as the = sign.
In your translation "which" becomes the interrogative adjective, and "dog" becomes the subject of the sentence. "It", which doesn't appear anywhere in the Italian sentence, has appeared magically to become the predicate pronoun.
The question is fundamentally asking: which (out of the many options) is the dog? Your translation is fundamentally asking: which dog (out of a group of dogs) is it?
Nicely explained thx.. I still think the English sentence would make more sence if they add "one" to the options: which one is the/a dog?
2927
Great explanation for this usage. The sentence I saw with "Qual" before this one was with the possessive pronoun, e.g. "Qual e il tuo cane?" and there I think that either "Which dog is yours?" or "Which is your dog?" would be acceptable translations into English (if anything, I"d probably use the first more than the second, even though the second is grammatically closer to the Italian). By removing the possessive pronoun, it reveals both a grammatical and meaning/usage difference "Which x is...?" and "Which is...?"
Should the answer be "Which one is the dog?" Asking out of many different things, one of them is the dog
It's like a question you would ask a 2 y/o - which one of these is the dog. "Which dog is it" implies you know it's a dog.
I agree with you. I can't think of a situation where one could use this sentence on it's own.
You've gone to the park with a Martian, whom you're currently teaching about different Earth animals. You point out to the Martian: "Look, there's a guy with a dog and a horse." The Martian, not knowing much yet, says: "Which is the dog?"
Ex. 1You are learning Italian and you are at the park with an Italian exchange student who is learning English. He asks you this question.
Ex. 2 You are taking your baby for a stroll in the park and the child sees many different animals. You kneel down and ask the child this question.
Ex. 3 You are learning Italian on Duolingo's website and they ask you to translate this phrase.
Jae's explanation may be imaginative, but it was by using imagination that he found an answer for you. Next time before you relegate a phrase to the scrap heap, remember that many of the people here make (made) their living as writers. But most of all, don't be so quick to give up- you can do this.
Marking this comment down is silly. People need to know that its is the correct usage here as a possesive. It's ALWAYS means it is.
"Genetic research has shown that it must have happened somewhere in East Asia, around 25,000 to 20,000 years ago: an early human managed to rear and domesticate a wolf pup. In the millennia that followed, this wolf transformed into the different forms of ‘man’s best friend’ that keep us company today, from the dachshund to the Pekingese and chihuahua. But the remains of an early breed of dog have never been found. The earliest finds date from around 15,000 years ago, leaving a gap of around 5,000 to 10,000 years. No wonder, therefore, that archaeologists are desperate to find an even older dog. Every now and then, a researcher will claim to have found one of these ‘missing links’ between wolf and dog, whipping up a storm of publicity. Unwarranted, Luc Janssens now concludes. He researched the ten claims that have been made and showed that all of these supposed dogs were, in fact, common or garden wolves, and far from domesticated."
This is what vet and archaeologist Luc Janssens said in his dissertation. PhD defence on 27 June, 2019. Leiden University
- 1011
I have tried the same translation: "Which dog is it" and that was accepted. I find the question: "Which is the dog" a little bit strange, and at the level of very small children. I see in my mind a group of animals and I ask, which of them is the species dog?! :)
no. which dog is it implies there are multiple dogs. which is the dog implies there is just 1 dog
- 348
I am a student of 4 years and I also thought the same thing.
It seems like the question should fundamentally be "Quale + è + il cane?" but we contract that to "Qual'è il cane?" as you wrote.
I kept getting this wrong because "cane" and "carne" sound almost the same to me. Then I went back to double check and realized that it's "la carne" and "il cane," so "il cane" is the only possible answer here. I'm not fluent yet in any language that has grammatical gender, so one more thing to learn to keep track of. LOL
In previous comments it was said that quale has only two forms - quale for singular and quali for plural. So where did qual come from?
Correct me if I got it wrong, but I believe 'quale/i' is the question word 'which', which should be followed by a noun, and 'qual' is the interrogative pronoun 'which one', which should be followed by a verb.
As far as I understand it:
Qual is a contraction of Quale - which used in front of e' (and in front of other words starting with the letter e)
Quali is the plural of Quale
In audio version is really hard to recognize "cane". I clearly hear "tane". Both in slow and quick motion. Have listened the audio ubout 10 times
in the vocabulary hints there is a "what" translation for "qual", but when typed it is reported as a mistake
it's like find the dog out of 100 other animals, anyway that can train your attention;)
I heard carne, not cane. I realize "il" was the key to getting it right, but the gentleman's voice is not as clear as the woman's.
Wouldn't "which dog" be "quale cane" and not "qual è cane"? That could be what is dog couldn't it?Seeing as how qual also means what....? Confusion it arises says it all......
I think this is the correct translation. The question then becomes, if you wanted to ask "Which dog is it?", how would you phrase that in Italian - Quale cane è?
The one between your pinguin and her hungry bear. But definitely not the one in the boot ...
I wish that voice would speak more clearly. I get may things wrong, because of that.
- 225
I notice that there is no elision. This potentially changes the meaning. Qual'è = Quale è and means "which is it". In this case Qual è was used without the apostrophe, Qual è = "what is it" (when referring to a potential choice). Qual è la torta = What is the cake? Qual è il cane = What is the dog?
I typed "Quality" by accident for this question and it marked it correct!? My answer should have been wrong!!
Why not translate as 'What is the dog' e.g is it a labrador or a poodle?
So, so English. Understand the grammar, but we usually say "Which dog is it?"
what does this mean? it might me grammatically correct but it doesn't have sense. which is a problem for a lot of the examples on this site.....
Ich lach mich kaputt, ich habe nicht hund sondern fleisch übersetzt, fand ich nicht ungewöhnlich bei all den vegetariern hier...
Where's the dog?!
I'll do you one better, who's the dog?
I'll do you one better, which is the dog?!
I had to.
I really think it a waste of time to use meaningless sentences for these excercises.
(Which is the dog?) .... Is bad ENGLISH!! ( WHICH one is the dog? or WHICH dog is your's or the ONE!!!!!
(WHICH IS THE DOG) is BAD ENGLISH!!!.... IT should be (WHICH ONE IS THE DOG) or (WHICH DOG IS IT!!!!) ARE YOU REALLY LISTENING DUOLINGO????
Could it also be translated as, "where is the dog?"? The hint for "qual" gives me which, where, and that...
- 981
I was told I had used the wrong word when 'qual e il cane' is exactly what I wrote from listening exercise.
I made it right. Qual é il cane. But I was wondering : why do you say: qual cane, but quale ragazzo. Both words are maschile ? Can someone help?
- 917
I read through your links. Non of them answers my original questions, why "quale é" is considered false.
Yes, i know it looks weird. But gramatically should be correct?
This really does not make sense in English. As in, you would never say this