"It is probably at home."

Translation: Den er nok hjemme.

[ConnieBake5]

Shouldn't "Det er sannsynligvis hjemme" be a correct answer?

[DanielaNec9]

I have the same question. It was my anwer aswell and was marked as incorrect...

[Sepochi]

That's what I wrote and it was marked as correct.

[DanielaNec9]

then probably I had a typing error or this wasn't marked as correct at that moment :)

[marcus..]

So "nok" can mean "probably"?

[unwallflower]

What is the difference between "trolig", "antakelig" and "sannsynligvis"? Is it incorrect to substitute either of the last two for "trolig"?

[fveldig]

trolig = probably

antakelig = presumably, probably

sannsynligvis = likely, probably

They should all be considered correct.

[OlavTryggv]

I put sannsynligvis and it wasn't accepted. Aside from that, everything was correct.

[Kilimanscharo]

thanks for these examples. And when do i use "nok" in the meaning of "probably"?

[unwallflower]

Thanks! It didn't accept my "det er antakelig hjemme", so that's why I was wondering.

[alek_d]

It is allowed now.

[Solvinter]

Not "sannsynligvis" ?

[BrettRyland]

What about antageligvis? I just got marked wrong for "Det er antageligvis hjemme."

[Deliciae]

Added. :)

[fveldig]

This should be allowed as well, so just report if you got an error for this.

[caromom97]

Can't you say "det er sikkert hjemme"?

[Deliciae]

You can, but it's closer to "surely" in meaning.

[Lalage6]

What is the difference between hjem and hjemme

[boxofcedar]

https://www.duolingo.com/comment/18500930/Hjem-hjemme

[Christian.920]

Is "heime" acceptable? I haven't seen that translation before?

[Deliciae]

It's an accepted spelling variation of "hjemme", though most would associate it with Nynorsk rather than Bokmål.

[Diana567690]

Twice now the Norwegian has given sannsynligvis in the sentence and translated it as ‘probably’ and then they say one can use ‘nok’ But have not mentioned this before. Rather unreasonable of them.

[Faradrim]

why is it den?

[Karine_GL]

it is a reference to a masculine thing (for example en bok :-)

[AaronWarwick]

Just so that I have this 100% correct. Could you clarify this for me?
We use "det" if we are not referring to an object at all. (eg, Det er mange folk i norge) but if we ARE referring to an object, we use the gender of the object AND if we don't know the object we assume masculine because thing (ting) is masculine?

[DanielaNec9]

How did you assume that "it is probably at home" referrs to a masculine thing?

[kashhhhhhhhhh]

Why not: sannsynligvis er det hjemme.