- Forum >
- Topic: Esperanto >
- "Kiu estas la numero de via t…
25 Comments
1385
"Kiu" is actually used to refer to something from a closed set. That's why we have the rule of thumb that it refers to people. There are only so many people in the world. However, it can refer to other closed sets -- like the finite set of possible telephone numbers -- which of these is yours?
The answer to "kio" is generally a noun, so the answer to "kio estas via telefonnumero?" would be "it's a series of digits which can be used to reach me by phone. In practice most people would just roll with it, and opinions may differ among fluent speakers of Esperanto.
No, kiu is more specific than kio, like 'that one' rather than just 'that'. Here, we're asking about a defined thing, 'your telephone number', so it's kiu.
- 1358
Well, the speaker assumes that the person asked already knows their telephone number. That's why 'kiu' is being used in that case.
I thought kiu meant which, which in English is used for selecting from a group of some sort. You could argue that any "what..." question assumes the listener knows the answer, so why is kiu the word to use here?
I think of kiu as which also, but that makes it work here in my mind. "Which number is the one for your phone?" is kind of how I hear it in my head. (Although the literal translation would be "Which is the number of your phone?" of course...)
I think that... kiu is used like an adjective, when the noun is stated. kio is used in place of the noun. You would say "kiu numero estas kvin" or "kio estas kvin" ("which number is five" or "what is five"). Here, it's a little tricky, since "kiu" is separated from "numero" in the sentence, but it is my thinking that because it is still explicitly stated, and because the "kiu" obviously refers to a "numero", we use "kiu" rather than "kio".
... but I am merely a komencanto trying to figure it out, so a more experienced esperantisto can certainly correct me...
Also a komencanto, but that is pretty much in line with my own thoughts on/impressions of it.
- 193
This reminds me that, “kiu,” is used for something that is known, but you’re just asking about it, and, “kio,” is used for something that is unknown.
- 1385
That's close.
- Kio means what.
- Kiu means which or who.
Since there are only so many possible phone numbers, it's possible to conceive of this as a "which" question. Of all the possible numbers, which one is your phone number?
I haven't actually looked into it in this case, but there's something similar in terms of personal names. It can be either kio estas via nomo? or kiu estas via nomo? - and in practice, both are about as common.
Saluton!
Mi ĵus renkontis vin
kaj ĝis frenezas.
Sed jen mia numero,
do voku min eble.
(Ĉu pli bone "telefonu al mi"?)
What if I said "Kiu estas via telefona numero?" Is that potentially acceptable by speakers?
I wouldn't say that this is the usual way to ask this question, by the way. Usually one uses a compound noun "telefonnumero". To this question here I'd rather reply with "LG-D821".
I didn't know that "telefonnumero" existed, but the placement of the possesive ("via") seemed strange to me, if the question isn't about the serial number of model number of the physical phone device.
Would "Kiu estas via numero de (la?) telefono?" or "Kiu estas via telefona numero?" also be correct and closer to the intended meaning than "Kiu estas la numero de via telefono?" (maybe on par with "Kiu estas via telefonnumero?")?
To me, "Kiu estas la numero de via telefono?" also implies that the asked person has exactly one phone (or only one which connected to the mainline or extension with the phone number in question), while in reality, many people have several devices with a shared phone number.
"nombro" describes specifically a quantity. Ekzemple, "Kio estas la nombro de gastoj, kiuj venos?"
"numero" describes a number kind of more abstractly.
