"Ĉiaj boteloj povas enhavi akvon."

Translation: All kinds of bottles can contain water.

[RaizinM]

Not when the bottle's made of pure sodium.

Sorry, I had to be the smart ass. :P

[zerozeroone]

A sodium bottle can contain water. Just not for very long...

[RaizinM]

Haha. Okay, fair enough.

[potestasity]

Or a bottle made out of any water-soluble substance.

[tu.8zPhLD72zzoZN]

Like an origami bottle?

[ysangkok]

Inversely, if the water is made using tritium, and the bottle is very thin, the radioactivity may break any kind of bottle.

[ConorFingleton]

Smashed bottles and broken bottles can't.

[Rippler]

If a bottle is so smashed apart that it contain any water for any amount of time, I don't think it can be considered a bottle any longer.

[OwenSannap]

It's considered a broken bottle

[ConorFingleton]

I stand corrected.
:)

[Jonahmax14]

This sounds like a bad excuse for when your parents find a handle of vodka under your bed.

[PysznaPapryka]

Boteloj de Klein ne povas.

[Wandermoench]

Kompreneble ili povas enhavi akvon
http://www.kleinbottle.com/

[PysznaPapryka]

Ŝajnas, ke vi ne komprenas la anglan, mi tradukis unu frazon por vi: “Need a zero-volume bottle?” signifas “Ĉu vi bezonas nul-volumenan botelon?”

[Wandermoench]

Have a better picture:
http://www.thisiswhyimbroke.com/klein-glass-bottle

You can even plug the "opening". Volume is a subtle thing;)

[PysznaPapryka]

Ho, tiuj glasaĵoj ne estas boteloj de Klein. Boteloj de Klein estas kvardimensiaj.

[babelpescado]

Is "All bottles can contain water" ok?

[mizinamo]

That would be more "Ĉiuj boteloj".

[krnm42]

I responded "All kinds of bottles could contain water" and got rejected. Is that a meaningful difference?

[mizinamo]

Your sentence is either past tense ("they could yesterday but not anymore today") or conditional ("they could but only if some condition were fulfilled").

I'd say that's different from a clear positive statement that the bottles can (right now, definitely) contain water.