"It is the man's book."

Translation:Det er mannens bok.

July 4, 2015



Pardon my misunderstanding: Given that bok is not neuter, what causes it to be det instead of den. Takk!

July 4, 2015

  • 211

You'd only use 'det/den' when your replacing a noun you've previously referred to. Given the context we wouldn't know whether or not this book has been referred to, but it most likely wasn't:

'Den er boken til mannen' would mean 'Den boken er boken til mannen', which is redundant. It could be said if someone asked whose book it was and you needed to be specific of which book you were talking about when you answered. Most often you would still answer with the above sentence. I've accepted 'den' in this case, but it wouldn't be very common, and only when you needed to specify specifically what "book" you were talking about.

July 5, 2015


What is "til"? Something like "of the"? It didn't come up on my first two times through this level.

January 25, 2017


There are two ways to phrase possession, and each varies slightly when a possessive adjective is used.

The first is when the possessor goes first. Note that the possessee is indefinite.

Det er prestens bord. That is the priest's table. Det er mitt bord. That is my table.

The second is when it comes second. Note that the possessee is definite.

Det er bordet til presten. That is the priest's table. Det er borden mitt. That is my table.

They're interchangeable, with slightly different tones and dialect preferences.

August 12, 2017


"Den er mannens bok" was marked wrong; I get the det/den issue as above, but the suggested answer it gave me was Det er mannens si bok" and I don't understand that answer?

May 28, 2017


When does the word for book have an o and when does it have an ø?

June 25, 2018


The <ø> is for plurals:

book = bok

the book = boken

books = bøker

the books = bøkene

June 26, 2018


surely they are talking about a specific book which would make bok boken?

July 16, 2016
Learn Norwegian (Bokmål) in just 5 minutes a day. For free.