I agree with AbbyLynn12, i just wanted to add that in Italian, parts that stick together can be placed (almost) anywhere in the sentence. These all mean the same, but they emphasize minor differencies in meaning:
- Bevo il caffè (i drink coffee, nothing special)
- Io bevo il caffè (I drink coffee, not you)
- Bevo io il caffè (i drink coffee, not eat it)
- Il caffè bevo io. (I drink the coffee, not the tea)
Piacere actually means "to please". So to say our generation likes coffee, you have to say the coffee is pleasing to our generation. Since you are actually naming the indirect object (to our generation) it comes after piacere. When you use a direct object /pronoun/, it comes before. "Mi piace il caffe' ". Coffee is pleasing to me/I like coffee. The grammatical rules of italian require the indirect object at the beginning (so technically, to me, coffee is pleasing). This is probably how you saw piacere last time. I don't think that it would be incorrect to keep the word order and say "Alla nostra generazione piace il caffe' ". I know if you were to say Michele likes coffee, you would say "A Michele piace il caffe' ". I think it is preference based on what you want to emphasize. That the generation likes coffee, as opposed to another drink; or that our generation likes it, as opposed to another generation.
Interesting, I use the passive voice and duo did not let me get away with it.
Coffee is liked by our generation.
I don't think I'll report it, because I was taught not to use the passive voice when speaking in English because it is weak English not strong English .. weak because the passive voice can hide things ... e.g. your car was smashed to smithereens .. oh really, by whom?! The issue doesn't occur if I say, 'I just smashed your car to smithereens'. See how I was hiding who did it when I used the passive voice?
Does anyone else have feelings about using the passive voice while speaking / writing in English?
That's funny, because I use passive voice more often than most people, because in formal scientific writing, everything is SUPPOSED to be in passive voice. "The solution was heated to 90 degrees Celsius, with stirring, for one hour." Who did the heating and stirring? Scientists don't care; they just want to know that it was done! :p (I wonder if this is true for scientific writing in other languages??)
it has it's place. Sometimes it needs to be used to specify meaning. Sometimes you specifically DON'T want someone to focus on the subject. Eg, bringing up the fact that the car is smashed, after they'd already gotten over the fact you did it, and you don't really want to bring attention back to it. I find using mix of passive and active voice to be quite elegant, and I like to make my writing elegant.
I said "Our generation likes the coffee shop." after checking that both coffee shop and coffee bar were valid, supposedly, suggestions. It wasn't accepted. Their answers were:
Correct solution: • Our generation likes the coffee. • Our generation likes coffee.
I don't believe that's what the sentence is meant to relay.