"No tengo muchos vasos."

Translation: I do not have many glasses.

[bbedford59]

It sounded as if she was saying "pasos".
I know that didn't make much sense, "I don't have many steps".

[44767mt]

You are right, the fast and slow versions are very different. She DEFINITELY says "patos" in the slow version. I lose more hearts because of the poor pronunciation than for any other reason.

[PenuelX]

I think it's because she said "basos" which sounded like patos or pasos. I hear my Spanish teacher pronounce v's in Spanish with the "b" sound all the time.

[isabela893461]

Rude duo, i put i have many glasses and it said it was wrong i was still close.:-(

[bal7774]

Would I do not have enough glasses be "no tengo suficiente vasos"?

[Remispanish]

That sounds about right

[Alexandra369571]

That is like saying 'I don't a have a sufficient amount of cups'

[alwaldow]

Sound that to me but for some reason I clicked the faster and it sounded different so I got it right this time.

[Heatherbennett0]

I know

[willbyzx]

I wrote - I haven't many glasses. this was marked wrong. Why, Do not have - and Haven't - they both mean the same thing

[omercito]

I haven't GOT = I don't have

"I haven't glasses" = INCORRECT

"I (do) have glasses" or "I don't have glasses" = CORRECT

"I have got glasses" or "I haven't got glasses" = CORRECT

[dianka9]

they correct "I haven't glasses" with "I have not glasses"... it seems to me that this two sentences have the same grammar, isn't it?

[omercito]

Yes, they are the same as in "I have not" and "I haven't", but both incorrect.

[jakkafang]

I haven't glasses sounds like medieval talk to me

[Heatherbennett0]

Ur right they do correct that ☺

[Yamx]

You can only negate "have" without using "do" when it's used as an auxiliary, e.g. "I haven't seen him." When "have" is the main verb of the sentence, indicating possessions, it has to be negated with "do" like any other main verb.

[Vedant147]

I wrote, "Don't have many glasses".

[trustingh]

What is wrong with I don't have lots of glasses? Apparently Duolingo says it is wrong.

[Wakati]

Same thing happened to me!!!

[SarantuyaT]

Here Duolingo means eyeglasses or drinking glasses?

[1malao33]

Drinking glasses

[Espeonage24]

But i thought eye glasses. That would be lentes or anteojos or gafas, right?

[karateduk]

right

[eittek]

Why can't I say "I don't have much glasses"?

[1malao33]

If you can count them, you should use many instead of much. "I don't have much water. I don't have many buckets."

[dumbass1971]

why not "No tengo POCOS vasos"? that was correct for "I have few books"

[William1949]

I made a mistake and wrote "I don't have many cups" and it said it was correct!
I thought taza was a cup and vaso is a glass.

[megan312758]

'I do not have many vases.' was accepted.

[DanielFloy4]

not many glasses.....I don't see a Yo.

[uritzvi]

what is wrong with "I have not many glasses" without the word got ?

[uritzvi]

what is wrong with "I have not many glasses" ?

[karateduk]

does anyone have lots of vases?

[EmersonTurner]

I put I dont have very many glasses and they said it was wrong. I think that is stupid

[noahmeanspeace]

By glasses does it mean lile glass for water (a cup made of glass) or optical glasses?

[alwaldow]

Gafas is the word for eyes glasses.

[FrostbiteIsCool]

Someone says to the other: "could I borrow a glass for some water?" Me: "NO TENGO MUCHOS VASOS".

[Sue919013]

Why not, !i haven't many glasses." I think the alleged answer with "I haven't GOT many glasses!" is over the top.

[James373004]

Whats the difference between muchos and tantos?

[Angelina196588]

Glasses as in the ones on your face or the drinking glasses?

[Zola-Magician]

What is the difference between muchos and muchas?