"He definitely wants to get married in a church."
Translation:Li nepre volas edziĝi en preĝejo.
Should probably accept <definitive> as well as <nepre> or <certe>. (My answer was still wrong because I used eklezio instead of preĝejo, though.)
Eklezio is the church as an institution, as the communion of the Christian believers. Preĝejo is a building for praying, not necessarily of the Christian faith. If you really need to distinguish there are words like kirko, moskeo, or sinagogo (kristana, islama, juda preĝejoj). But normally you say just "preĝejo."
Jes, mi tuj komprenis mian eraron; mi estis nur senatenta. Dankon pro via ekspliko!
Ekspliko is a word that I barely encountered in 20 years of speaking Esperanto. Now I'm seeing it everywhere among new speakers. I wonder if it got listed in Google Translate, Tatoeba, or some other online dictionary. It's a rare word - roughly equivalent to "to explicate".
The normal word for "explanation" is klarigo.
Of course, if you were trying to say "thanks for your explication", please pardon the interruption.
Isn't "definitive" (in esperanto) an anglicism? (if we use it for that meaning)
Edz-iĝi is husband-to become; edzin-iĝi is wife-to become. Unless he's looking to become a wife, li volas edziĝi.
I used "geedziĝi" (because Duo has already taught us that word earlier in this same lesson). Why would Duo now count "geedziĝi" as wrong? Perhaps since the word "He" is in the sentence maybe Duo wants us to use "edziĝi"? I can't see why geedziĝi could be wrong.
For future learners, here is an explanation from some experienced Esperantists in the Duo FB Group:
Sean Stangl "Geedziĝi" does in fact mean "to get married" in general. "Geedzigi" means "to unite."
Spencer van der Meulen While some speakers do use it that way, it's a little more complicated.
Strictly speaking "ge-" is only used when it includes both male and female people. So "geedziĝi" means "to become husband(s) AND wife(s)". (plural is possible for example in "ĉi-jare 200 homoj geedziĝis ĉi tie" - this year 200 people married here, or literally, became husbands and wives)
But "li volas edziĝi" and "li volas geedziĝi" are nonetheless indeed both possible. The first is the norm (literally: he wants to become a husband), and the second is only possible because it implies a "kun ..." (literally: he wants to become husband and wife [with a woman]) If he were to marry a man, strictly speaking "geedziĝi" with ge- is impossible, because the marriage is between two men, no woman involved. So a gay couple "edziĝas" - becomes husbands. And similarly, for a lesbian couple only "edziniĝi" is possible - to become wives.
But as I said at the start, there are some speakers who do use ge- as a "male and/or female" prefix, in which case "geedzo" with the meaning "spouse" is possible, and geedziĝi could be used in every context, but this is not considered to be standard Esperanto.
Spencer van der Meulen Oh, and I might better also share this handy overview:
- she got married = ŝi edziniĝis (lit. she became a wife)
- he got married = li edziĝis (lit. he became a husband)
- they (♂♀) got married = ili geedziĝis (lit. they became spouses/husband and wife)
- they (♂♂) got married = ili edziĝis (lit. they became husbands)
- they (♀♀) got married = ili edziniĝis (lit. they became wives)
my understanding of ge- was that it is either one, male and female or gender-neutral. for example, I learned geedzo as spouse but gepatroj would be parents.
In the two-sexes system ge~ involves both sexes and – officially – it is only for plural use. Same sex marriages and gender diversity are a quite new concept. We have do adapt the language. My favourite is the use of ge~ for neutral forms and singular.
Perhaps "geedziĝi" is reserved for same-sex marriages? Just trying to learn correct spelling/grammar usage.
No, if anything it's reserved for heterosexual marriages because the "ge" prefix means it involves both genders
For the same reason you cited I also wrote "Li nepre volas geedziĝi en preĝejo." and it accepted it. May be they added this answer as a correct one later.
"sendube" for "definitely"? If not, why not?