"We always study together."

Translation: Ni ĉiam studas kune.

[DrewDdmek]

Why doesn't "cxiam" end with an "e?" It is an adverb, no?

[mizinamo]

Yes, but the correlatives have their own endings that are unrelated to the usual -e -i -o -a.

Similarly, "kiu" is not an imperative, for example.

There are also other adverbs that don't end in "e", such as "ĵus, nur, nun".

[arhop2]

As i still have trouble accusative why is ni not nin

[Lochlannn]

you are not the object being influenced by the verb. instead, in this case, you are the one doing the action. a good example sentance of the accusative is "Mi manĝas la pomon" You are the topic and you perform the verb upon the said object (i.e. the apple). Hope this helps

[Lochlannn]

Why not "studi"

[mizinamo]

Because that's the infinitive, but you need the present tense here (for something that's always true).

It would be as if you said, "We be smart" (with infinitive) rather than "We are smart" (with present tense).

[P_Azul]

Because that would make it "We always to study together."

The "to study" is the inifinitive, the form of a verb for talking aobut it: You're not studying (studas), but you're talk about to study (studi).

E.g. We always try to study together. What do you do? We try. That's the action of the sentence; it gets the -as suffix. Next you talk about something that you try: What do you try? "To study together." That's your infinitive, which in English usually starts with "to", and which in Esperanto gets the -i suffix. So: "Ni ĉiam prov-as stud-i kune."